09/04/12

Classical Oration structure of an argument was a concept first used in early Greek and Romans societies.  It was used when making  a very formal argument.  Classical Oration is structured by using an introduction with a thesis, followed by 3 supporting and logical argument.  Then, the argument will be summed up by using a conclusion.  Many times Classical Oration will be used when writing a paper in an education setting, making an argument in a court of law or when making a formal speech, such as a Senator addressing the Senate.  This form of argument is used for persuasion and is designed to be used for an educated audience.  Classical Oration would serve well in formal setting, but in a more informal setting an audience may begin to tune it.  You definitely would not use this form of arguing when arguing a point with friends.   

Rogerian Argument, in my opinion, is the best structure for arguing a point.  The main emphasis for a Rogerian argument is to abstain from arguing until you fully understand the topic.  In the text, Everything's an Argument, A Rogerian argument follows the guidelines of first fully, fairly and sympathetically state the opposing position and why it may be valid before pushing forward with your agenda  (177).  Then, state your opinion with evidence supporting  your claim.  Finally, convey to the audience why it would benefit the reader to sway to your position.  In a  Rogerian argument, the person making a point wants to do so by first finding common ground, before attempting to convince an audience on a position.  This argument can be used in a very formal or informal setting, and in my opinion has the highest likelihood of success.  Whether speaking at a commencement ceremony or discussing an issue amongst friends, a person will likely receive greater success  in swaying opinions if they first establish common ground. 

Toulmin argument was developed by the British philospher Stephen Toulmin.  In this style of arguing, the main focus is persuading an audience in a real world setting.  Many times a Toulmin argument will be highly controversial, because  Toulmin believes there is no point in arguing a topic that everyone agrees with.  This style of arguing is all about sticking to the facts in order to prove your claims.  Theories do not hold as much weight in this form, because theories are subjective.  This is a great style of persuasion, if you have the evidence to prove your claims, but not all arguments are black and white.  Therefore, not every argument has the ability to be discussed in this nature.  This style of argument requires much preparation and research in order to fully support any of your claims.